I recently re-discovered an article
called "Understanding the Transvestite" which I first read
about 20 years ago at a time in my life when I was still searching for answers
to questions that I no longer really care about. That's why the article has languished under a
figurative mountain of other accumulated papers until its rediscovery. (I should admit at the outset that I very
much dislike the term transvestite and much prefer TGrl but since the term was
used in the article I will use it it here to avoid confusion.)
On reading it again, I was struck
by its certainty and conviction and thought I would share it with you because we
all love certainty and conviction........don't we?
“Transvestism is not just deviant
behaviour, it is wrong. TVism is a sexual act with solace through
gratification. TVs have an active fantasy life. Following an episode, TVs loath
themselves. TVism is rooted in childhood
where proper nurturing (actively bad by the mother and passively poor by the
father) to form a healthy gender identity did not not occur. Overall, the home environment was cold, tense
and very inhibited fostering insecurity and a retreat into fantasy.
For the individual concerned, the
creation of a second personality brings him a closeness that he has never
had. Further his "creation"
measures up standards of womanhood addressing his sense of failure as a
man. Because of the lack of love in childhood,
the individual has an exaggerated self-love.
In addition, TVs are characterised by having low sex drives. The
"transvestic individual" also has resentments, hatreds and hostile
feelings.”
I should add that the answer provided is to turn to God for help with this sin.
Whatever about the answer and I am
fairly certain God doesn't care about whether I wear a dress or not, I was, as
I said at the beginning, struck by the certainty and the conviction in terns of
the description and analysis. Of course, as a rule, the most effective theories
are those with certainty and conviction. Unfortunately, conviction is not the
same as being right. It's certainly no substitute for rigorous analysis and testing of theory against the empirical evidence.
I certainly display some of the characteristics listed
but not all of them. Equally, there are other factors at play in my own
situation outside of those listed.
I suspect that the authors of the article see themselves as God fearing folk out to save the world from the sex motivated sinner. I hope rather than believe that the authors have evolved their thinking over the intervening years and have come to realise that making people feel bad about themselves is grounded in Old Testament hatreds rather New Testaments Christianity. If they want to find sinners motivated by sexual desires or frustrations the mirror might be a good place to start their search.
No comments:
Post a Comment